"To all my friends on the left who are freaking the f**k out about Trump – remember this – if you didn’t start nuthin’, there wouldn’t be nuthin’.
This is what it will be like until progressives understand that there is a vast segment of the American population who just wants to be left the F alone. They are generally reasonable people who will agree with you when something makes sense but when you politicize every aspect of life and seek to force your beliefs on them through the coercive force of government - this is the result.
The US Constitution is designed to prevent this – but you Woodrow Wilson look-alikes just couldn’t leave it alone, could you?
Excerpting from another post a while back:
The miracle of our Constitution is that it was designed to constrain GOVERNMENT, not people. That is a very important concept because no matter the philosophy or ideology of the ruling party, they were subject to the same rules of operation. For a couple hundred years, major political parties seeking to control the country were bound by the same limits set by the enumerated powers defined in the document and enforced by checks and balances established by the balance of power of a tripartite government.
Beginning the moment the Constitution was signed, a war began between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists – essentially between those who saw government as a guardian of natural liberty and those who sought to use government as a tool to satisfy the wants, needs and desire of citizens. This war began to intensify as Abraham Lincoln abrogated the Constitution to keep the Union together during the Civil War, and accelerated under the despicable anti-Constitutionalist, Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson was the first true “progressive”, meaning that he saw the Constitution as an impediment to perfection of society. Wilson noted his intent in a campaign speech:
“All that progressives ask or desire is permission—in an era when ‘development, ‘evolution,’ is the scientific word—to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that a nation is a living thing and not a machine.
Some citizens of this country have never got beyond the Declaration of Independence, signed in Philadelphia, July 4th, 1776. Their bosoms swell against George III, but they have no consciousness of the war for freedom that is going on today.”
Wilson also set the table for such “strongman” governance via the methods he sought to bring it about. He believed that the power of the president was limited only by how much that person could get away with. Wilson’s perspective was that once a president assumed control with popular backing, no single force could withstand him. According to Wilson, a president “is at liberty, both in law and conscience, to be as big a man as he can. His capacity will set the limit.”
Of course, FDR, the progressive icon, would take Wilson’s idea using the Great Depression as an excuse and run with it, giving America the socialist underpinnings that is eating the federal budget alive today.
The point of this rambling history lesson is this – if a president is limited only by his or her ambitions, displaying a disdain for the separation of powers and a catch me if you can attitude, an can willfully ignore the Constitution, America’s days with a stable, predictable and equitable form of governance is over. If the answer to one president’s extra-constitutional actions are the extra-constitutional actions of the next president, we are doomed to the same existence as a tennis ball on Centre Court at Wimbledon.
Every president rebels against the separation of powers to claim power for the executive branch. President Obama certainly isn’t the first but he is the first to do it with malice aforethought (his “fundamental transformation”) and with a degree of maliciousness and contempt unseen since Wilsonian times. Also just as unprecedented is the size, scope and unaccountable power possessed by the army of deep (administrative) state now at the command of the Executive (grown from FDR’s statist embryo).
John Adams famously wrote:
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
The Presidency of Barack H. Obama has done more to validate Adams’ warning than perhaps any other but the end to this isn’t the election of another strongman to hit the ball back into the other court with and equally extra-constitutional racket. The temptation is great to do so, to “set things right”, so to speak, people say this is a main attraction for Trump – he will “hit back.” Sadly though, as in a tennis match, “hitting back” only keeps the set going until the ball is eventually miss-hit so far out of bounds that the set stops and someone loses.
Beyond my distaste and lack of trust for the person who is Donald J. Trump, this is my greatest concern, that we permanently become an extra-constitutional country, batted from tyrant to tyrant, doing and undoing each other’s acts while the rest of America wrenches their necks from watching the back and forth. There is a reason the Presidential Oath requires the taker to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” and not America’s citizens.
The war we wage must be about the preservation of the Constitution, not revenge or the superiority of one ideology over the other.
Know this - if you live by the sword of government, you will die by the sword of government. That every action has an opposite and equal reaction is not just Newton’s Third Law of Motion, it is the First Law of Politics."
No comments:
Post a Comment